RSS

Tag Archives: Republican

Understanding Worldviews: Or Why You are More than Just a “Liberal” or a “Conservative”

As a teacher charged with the task of helping students learn how to construct and deconstruct arguments, I often begin the year by asking my students to articulate their own personal worldview.  Why is there something rather than nothing?  How do you know what you know?  What is the meaning of history?  How do you explain the moral nature of humanity?  What has gone wrong with the world?  Can it be set right?  Will it be set right?  What will “right” ultimately look like?

As foundational as these questions may first appear to be, you might be surprised to know how rare it is for a student to be able to answer these questions in any kind of a meaningful way.  Regardless of how bright the student may be, they are often incapable of providing even the most rudimentary of responses, as they simply have not been taught how to consider their own thought-life.  And yet, as you can see from the questions themselves, worldviews are a summation of everything we believe to be true about the nature of the world around us.  And as such, worldviews are very much a part of our daily existence, even if we don’t spend a great deal of time consciously considering their merits.  Read the rest of this entry »

 

Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

The Meaning of Language: Or Why I Wish Republicans Would Stop Talking About “God”

Over these past few days, much ink has been spilled on the subject of the Democratic party’s eleventh hour decision to include the word “god” in their official platform. But in case you haven’t been paying attention, let me bring you up to speed in short order. When the Democratic Convention recently adopted their official party platform, they elected to approve a document that did not contain the word “god,” and did not recognize Jerusalem as the rightful capital of Israel. When Republicans caught wind of this omission, the usual talking heads seized the airwaves, and began to paint the Democrats as a party that didn’t want “god” to be recognized. This, of course, was done with no small measure of self-righteous indignation, as many right-leaning pundits were quick to point out the fact that the Republican platform contained no less than ten acknowledgements of “god.” So the implication was, if you believe in “god,” the Republicans are the party for you because the all-important scorecard read 10 mentions of “god” to none.

As I have watched these events unfold, and as I have watched the ensuing comedy that surrounded the Democrat’s hasty attempt to ramrod the politically expedient language back into their official platform, I have found myself wondering … Read the rest of this entry »

 

Tags: , , , , , ,

The Sunday Seven

March 18, 2012

Welcome to this week’s edition of “The Sunday Seven.”  As always, this post is all about sharing some of the more interesting news and insights that I have encountered throughout the week, as well as a little humor to lighten your day.  Hopefully, there’s a little something here that will peak your interest and give you pause to think.   Enjoy!

Questions without Answers?

The power of questions in the sharing of the gospel.  In this new series found on Scot McKnight’s Jesus Creed, Andrew Wilson explores the role of questions in a post-Christian culture.  Could be an interesting discussion to follow.

Best discussion yet on the Kony 2012 campaign …

Is Kony 2012 Good or Bad?  As is ususally the case, Rachel Held Evans brings her usual light touch to a sensitive topic, offering insights that are worthy of your consideration.  Hands down, the most balanced presentation I’ve seen on this issue.

How Should One Read Scripture?

An Evangelical and Critical Approach to Scripture.   A wise and timely piece on the need to read Scripture through the eyes of “critical faith.”

Here’s a Little Something to Tick Off Everybody …

Abortion: The Democrat’s “Muslim Obama.”  From J.D. Kirk’s “Storied Theology” blog, this will push buttons on both the left and the right, which is often, if not always, a sign of good thinking.

A Brave Piece on Human Sexuality and Spirituality …

Talk About Sex.  Again, from J.D. Kirk’s “Storied Theology” blog.  Even as I read the article, I find myself wanting to say, “But, but, but …”  And by the time I got to the end, I realized that my “buts” were exactly the point he was trying to make.

A Great Piece of Christian Satire …

Jesus Holds a Business Meeting.  Kinda painful if this describes your church (which it probably does!).  Credit to Ryan Mahoney for finding this.

Mathematical musings from our favorite Raptor …

 
2 Comments

Posted by on March 18, 2012 in Sunday Seven

 

Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

Presidential Politics and the Character of the Man

As the Presidential primaries continue to roll along, with another 11 states set to hold contests this upcoming Tuesday, a new poll jointly sponsored by NBC News and the Wall Street Journal seems to suggest that the heavily contested primary season is damaging people’s perception of both the Republican Party and the candidates themselves.  At present, when asked to describe the Republican primaries and candidates in a single word or phrase, nearly 70% of the poll’s respondents – including 60% of independents and more than 50% of Republicans – have offered a less than glowing evaluation of the candidates and their behaviors.

While this is not particularly unusual in a hotly contested primary season, what is potentially of concern for evangelical Christians, is our public identification with the Republican Party.  According to a recent article on The Pew Forum, white evangelical Protestants seem to be trending towards a greater affiliation with the Republican Party.  In 2008, 65% of this group identified (or leaned) Republican, while 28% identified (or leaned) Democratic.  But three years into President Obama’s administration, this 37-point gap has swelled to 46 points as 70% of white evangelicals now lean Republican and only 24% lean Democratic.

While some may read this data in a positive light, I can’t help but wonder what this caustic season of Presidential primaries is doing to be people’s perception of the evangelical church and of Christ himself.  When the public figures we either tacitly or openly support conduct themselves in such a caustic manner, people make assumptions about the values we hold to be true.  And my question is: why are we, as evangelicals, not holding candidates to higher standards by openly challenging them on the manner in which they are conducting themselves in this race?   While this conclusion may not be all that flattering to the evangelical community to which I belong, it would seem to me that we appear to be entering into a dangerous new era in Christian history, in which we seem to be willing to set aside character issues so long as our pastors and our candidates publicly advocate what we believe to be the right theology, methodology and/or policy.

 

 
3 Comments

Posted by on March 5, 2012 in Politics and Culture

 

Tags: , , , , , , , , ,

When Presidential Candidates Talk About God

It is a commonly held belief that American voters want to know about the religious leanings of their presidential candidates.  Do they believe in a god; and if so, which one?  Why do they believe?  And how will this belief inform their policies?  Will they defend the separation of church and state?  Or will they use federal monies to fund “faith-based” initiatives?  These are the sorts of things we want to know … aren’t they?

Last month, USA Today reported on a new study just released by Lifeway Research.  According to their survey of 2000 voters, only 16% of Americans would find themselves more likely to vote for a candidate if he or she were to consistently express religious beliefs in public forums.  Now take a look at some of the other findings:

As you can see, Republicans (32%) are eight times more likely to be positively influenced by a candidate’s religious views than are Democratic voters (4%).  Conversely, more than half of all Democrats (55%) would actively move away from supporting a religiously vocal candidate, as opposed to the 7% of Republicans who would do the same.

So what do you think?  Does a candidate who expresses his or her religious beliefs have the potential to draw you towards them or does it tend to push you away? 

 
12 Comments

Posted by on February 23, 2012 in Politics and Culture

 

Tags: , , , , , , , , , , ,

American Women: Second Class Citizens?

In 1917, Jeannette Rankin, an avowed pacifist and member of the Republican party,[1] became the first woman elected to serve in the United States Congress.  Since that time, only 275 other women have served in that august and rather insular body.

Stop and think about that for a moment.  In the 95 years that have passed since Rankin’s election, only 275 other women have been elected to the United States Congress.  Why is that?

Why is it that women make up 18.9% of the world’s legislatures,[2] but only 17.4% of the United States Congress?[3]  How is it that this progressive, democratic, world-shaping empire actually elects fewer women to public office than other regions in the world?


[1] In an odd historical footnote, Rankin is also known as the only member of Congress to have voted against the United States entering into both World War I and World War II.

 

Tags: , , , , , , , , , ,

 
Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 663 other followers

%d bloggers like this: