RSS

Tag Archives: literature

The Naruszewicz Files: Books That Changed My Thinking on Matters Related to Race

In a previous post entitled “You Know It’s a Good Book When,” I shared with you a piece of advice once given to me by my old English teacher, Jeffrey Naruszewicz.  In short, he encouraged me to always be reading books that “pissed me off.”  Why?  Because books of this nature have a way of making you see things you never saw before.  They ask you to walk in another’s shoes.  They refuse to allow for easy answers.  And in the end, they make you a stronger person by virtue of making you a better thinker.

Thus, in this post, I offer you the first installment of “The Naruszewicz Files.”  These files are the books in my library that initiated a sea-change in my thinking on a particular subject or issue.  My honest prayer is that as you approach this list, you might seriously consider picking up at least one of these volumes in the interest of growth and honest dialog.

The Autobiography of Malcolm X (as Told to Alex Haley) by Malcolm X and Alex Haley.   This was the book that started it all for me.  Born into a predominantly white suburban culture, I was raised to believe that Dr. Martin Luther King Jr. was the beginning and the end of everything that needed to be said on matters of racial justice.  But when I first encountered Malcolm X as a junior in college, I immediately knew that there was so much more to be said.  X challenged everything that made me comfortable; and in the end, he taught me more about “living out faith” than almost any Christian I had ever read.  It is because of this book that I finally abandoned political science as a major and it is because of this book that I turned to the field of sociology.

Divided by Faith: Evangelical Religion and the Problem of Race in America by Michael O. Emerson and Christian Smith.  In 2001, Emerson and Smith conducted a study on white evangelical America and the issue of race.  What they found is that despite the efforts of many evangelical leaders, it is evangelicals themselves who may be partially responsible for preserving the racial chasm in modern day America.  That is not to say that evangelicals are active racists.  Instead, it evangelicalism’s focus on individualism, personal relationships and free will that prevents them from seeing the systemic problems that plague American culture.  In other words, many white Christians believe that there’s nothing that can’t be solved by the repentance and conversion of the sinful individuals.  In the end, a tough, sobering look at the modern evangelical movement.

Black and White Styles in Conflict by Thomas Kochman.  This is difficult book to put on this list.  There are clearly problems with the methodology of comparing the styles of a white, middle class population with “community blacks,” which is code for poor, urban blacks.  Nevertheless, Kochman’s contention that viewing black culture as a deviant version of the majority white culture is worthy of serious consideration and honest dialog. In the end, the book makes the list because, methodological warts and all, it changed how I think about matters related to race.  Special thanks to Dr. Alvaro Nieves, former professor of sociology at Wheaton College, who used this book as the foundation of one of the most dynamic undergraduate courses I had the privilege to take.

Race Matters by Cornel West.  First published on the one-year anniversary of the L.A. riots, West examines a multitude of topics in a series of rapid-fire essays.  Ranging from black nihilism to the dearth of black leadership, and from affirmative action to the state of black-Jewish relations, West’s biting commentary is never short of either passion or radical suggestions.  While the reader will certainly find many things to disagree with, West does a stellar job of igniting the conversation in way that makes it accessible for all to approach.

The Hidden Wound by Wendell Berry.  First published in 1970, this is an eloquent examination of the problem of race by a rural farmer/English professor – a man who has suffered as the descendant of slaves, but a man who desires to see an end to both racism and the guilt that is passed down from generation to generation.  Paying special attention to the ways in which racism has damaged the dominant white culture, this book, in many ways, reads almost  like a piece of poetry and yet, its eloquence never gets in the way of its prophetic truth telling.

Race Rules: Navigating the Color Line by Michael Dyson.  Former welfare father.  Ordained Baptist minister.  Princeton Ph.D.  While these may not be the sorts of credentials one would ordinarily cluster together, these are the credentials of Dr. Michael Dyson.  Bridging the gap between black and white communities in America, between the academy and the street, and between yesterday and today, Dr. Dyson is one of those rare intellectuals that knows how to speak the language of common sense.

So what about you?  Have you read anything on the subject of race and race relations that has changed your thinking?  Any recommendations?  I’d love to hear them. 

 

Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

You Know It’s a Good Book When …

Twenty years ago, in my senior year of high school, the English honors teacher, Mr. Jeffrey Naruszewicz, ended the class period by going around the room asking each us what university we were planning to attend.  When it came to me, I answered, “Wheaton College,” and assumed that he would simply move on to the next student.  But he didn’t.  Instead, he stopped, turned his head to look back at me, and said this:

“That’s a good fit for you.  Just make sure you keep reading books that piss you off.”

And then he moved on.  Now some might object to the “salty” nature of his advice, but truth be told, it’s one of the best pieces of guidance I’ve ever received.  Reading books that “piss you off” means you read books that don’t agree with your understanding of the world.  Reading books of this nature means exposing yourself to other ideas that are in deep conflict with your own perspective.  It means refusing to accept the construction of “strawman” arguments in favor of reading arguments by people who have a radically different worldviews.  In the end, reading books that challenge you means becoming a life-long learner as opposed to being someone who is comfortable in the mistaken notion that the world is easily understood and categorized.

Last night, as I began a new book entitled The End of Sexual Identity: Why Sex is Too Important to Define Who We Are, I couldn’t help but think back to my old teacher.  He would be proud of my selection.  For this is the kind of book that is fearless in its orientation.  It’s the kind of book that is not afraid to take a very sharp blade to the throats of our sacred cows on both the left and the right.

Indeed, no sooner is the author finished slashing away at the “privileged status” of the heterosexual majority, when she openly assails the cultural belief that sexual desire can form the core of a human identity.  She’s looking at the right, she’s looking at the left, and she’s taking shots at everyone.  It’s an audacious book; and one that I suspect will earn its rightful place among my Top-10 books of 2012.

But that’s not really the point of this post.  The point of this post is to ask you: are you still reading books that “piss you off?”  Or have you settled into a genteel reading cycle where the books you read simply confirm what you already know to be “true?” 

 

Tags: , , , , , , , , ,

Thanksgiving, Indulgence and “The Hunger Games” Triology … (part 3)

SPOILER ALERT:  I’ve been told I need to add a spoiler alert to these sorts of posts.  I’ve never really understood this practice, as I’ve always assumed that if I am reading something, I am going to learn something about the subject at hand.  Nevertheless, if you thought you were going to read this post and learn nothing about The Hunger Games, you have now been warned that this is not likely to be the case.  Tread carefully.

Two weeks ago, I received my copy of The Hunger Games trilogy.  With all three books currently scaling the heights of the bestseller list and with the first of the films due to be released this spring, I was curious to know what all the fuss was about.  Much to my surprise, these books have not only been page-turningly-good, they have also provided many unexpected critiques of a culture that is in desperate need of such criticism.  If you would like to read the first two posts, I include them here for your reading pleasure.

The Hunger Games Trilogy … (part 1)

The Hunger Games Trilogy … (part 2)

Today, I’d like to talk about the culture of indulgence.  While most of us are somewhat uncomfortable talking about this issue, there is no question that America is an indulgent nation, unparalleled in its ability to meet every whim and passing fancy of its population.  From an annual expenditure of $166 billion spent on alcohol[1] to $41 billion spent on pets,[2] we have the economic capacity to pander to our desires in a way that no country has ever possessed.  But how many of us consider the food we take in to be an extravagance?  According to Forbes magazine, one of the five most expensive “addictions” faced by Americans is the addiction to food.  Last week, we celebrated a national holiday by spending $875 million buying enough turkey to give everyone who was celebrating three pounds of meat.  According to the Center for Disease Control,[3] 34.4% of adults older than twenty are technically overweight; while another 33.9% of the adult population is technically obese.  So altogether, almost 70% of the adult American population is gorging on food, which in turn costs us $107 billion on treatment for heart disease, osteoarthritis, hypertension, gall bladder disease and cancer.[4]

Now consider this timely passage from Catching Fire, the second novel in The Hunger Games trilogy.  The context is a feast that has been thrown in honor of the Games’ champion and the novel’s heroin, Katniss Everdeen.

Every table present new temptations, and even on my restricted one-taste-per-dish regimen, I begin filling up quickly.   I pick up a small roasted bird, bite into it, and my tongue floods with orange sauce.  Delicious.  But I make Peeta eat the remainder because I want to keep tasting things, and the idea of throwing away food, as I see so many people doing so casually, is abhorrent to me.  After about ten tables, I’m stuffed, and we’ve only sampled a small number of the dishes available.  Just then, my prep team descends on us.  They’re nearly incoherent between the alcohol they’ve consumed and their ecstasy at being at such a grand affair.

“Why aren’t you easting?” asks Octavia.

“I have been, but I can’t hold another bite,” I say.  They all laugh as if that’s the silliest thing they’ve ever heard.

“No one lets that stop them!” says Flavius.  They lead us over to a table that holds tiny stemmed wineglasses filled with clear liquid.  “Drink this!”

Peeta picks one up to take a sip and they lose it.

“Not here!” shrieks, Octavia.

“You have to do it in there,” says Venia, pointing to doors that lead to the toilets.  “Or you’ll get it all over the floor!”

“Peeta looks at the glass again and puts it together. “You mean this will make me puke?”

My prep team laughs hysterically.  “Of course, so you can keep eating,” says Octavia.  “I’ve been in there twice already.  Everyone does it, or else how would you have any fun at the feast?”

I’m speechless, staring at the pretty little glasses and all they imply.[5]

At its core, The Hunger Games, Catching Fire and Mockingjay are all novels of political dissent; and as such, they have to paint a society that is worthy of rebelling against.  If they fail at that task, then the actions of the heroin and her friends are ultimately meaningless, or worse yet, wicked.  So what kind of society is it that Collins deems to be degraded and worthy of overthrow?  A society that is so overly decadent that gluttony is casually overlooked by the wealthy and privileged.  When you consider the fact that Collin’s intentionally set her novel in the ruins of North America, her critique could be more explicit or plain.

What do you think?  Do you think that the indulgences of the rich are ample grounds for political revolution?  What if their decadence come at the expense of those that scratch out meager lives in grinding, degrading poverty?

One last question … How do you think your answer might differ from the answer of someone living in abject poverty?

 

Tags: , , , , , , , , , ,

The Very Best In Violent Young Adult Literature …

On the heels of yesterday’s post (“Anything to Get Them to Read …”), I decided to delve a little deeper in the world of Young Adult Fiction.  Quite honestly, I have been fascinated to read the various responses that many of you submitted to that initial post; and I find myself wondering what the state of young adult fiction tells us about what we believe to be true in terms of the future and what kind of world we are preparing our kids to inhabit.

So let’s start by taking a look at another list: “The 2010 Best Books for Young Adults” as compiled by the Young Adult Library Services Association.[1] This is an alphabetical list of ninety books, the first ten of which I will offer as a sampling below:

Wintergirls by Laurie Halse Anderson.  Lia is haunted by her best friend’s death from bulimia, as she struggles with her own eating disorder.

Tales of the Madman Underground by John Barnes.  In an attempt to distance himself from the rest of the students in the school’s therapy group known as the Madman Underground, Karl launches his senior year with “Operation Be Fucking Normal.”

The Unnameables by Ellen Booraem.  In a place where everything has a name and every name has a meaning, outsider Medford Runyuin struggles in vain to follow the rules of his adopted home.

The Sweetness at the Bottom of the Pie by Alan Bradley.  Flavia de Luce is delighted with the discovery of a dead snipe on her doorstep and considers it a bonus when a human body is found in her cucumber patch.

Going Bovine by Libba Bray.  Cameron knew there was something wrong when he started seeing pillars of fire and angels, but he never imagined he had mad cow disease.

Demon’s Lexicon by Sarah Rees Brennan.  Sixteen-year-old Nick and his older brother Alan are always on the run. Now, Alan has been marked by a demon and to save him, the boys must become the hunters.

Hate List by Jennifer Brown.  In the year following the devastating shootings at her high school orchestrated by her boyfriend Nick, Valerie must come to terms with grief and guilt in order to move on with her life.

All the Broken Pieces by Anne E. Burg.  12-year-old Matt struggles to cope with his memories of family left behind in war-torn Vietnam with the help of his adoptive parents, his music teacher, and his baseball coach.

Fire by Kristin Cashore.  In a world full of monsters so beautiful they lure people into their doom, how can people protect themselves from human monsters?

Because I am Furniture by Thalia Chaitas.  Anke watches her siblings and mother suffer at the hands of her abusive father until she finds enough strength, through involvement in volleyball, to demonstrate her needs.

What do you think?  As I skimmed that list, this is what I saw:  death by bulimia, harsh adoptive homes, “bonus human bodies,” mad cow disease, hunting demons, boyfriends that become high school shooters, “war torn Vietnam,” human predators (presumably pedophiles and the like), abusive fathers and a desire to be “fucking normal.”

Now when it comes to art and culture, people seem to gravitate towards one of two extremes.  The first group wants to suggest that art is merely entertainment and it doesn’t connect in any significant way to the greater culture at large.  So for instance, people in this group feel no internal constraints against playing violent video games because they are just games, not reality.  These are the people that suggest that “Glee” is just a television show, in spite of the writers’ open admissions to the contrary.  In other words, the people in this group erect a very strong wall between art and entertainment and the world around them.  They believe that life can be compartmentalized to such a degree that what we read, see, play and hear has little to no impact upon how we think and view the world.

The second group, by contrast, suggests that all art is a reflection of the greater culture, and therefore all art bears witness to the culture’s values and beliefs. With no hesitation whatsoever, I place myself firmly in this latter group, for I believe that all art is the product of individuals and that all individuals are the products of the times in which they live.  Therefore, to my way of thinking, all art, as it is produced by human beings, must be culturally bound in some way or another.

So the questions I am pondering after reviewing the list above are these: what does our society believe regarding violence?  Why is violence such a prevalent theme in the fiction we produce for our children?  Is the reality of history finally overcoming the “myth of progress” that was propagated by the Enlightenment thinkers?  If so, what will this myth be replaced by in the broader culture? And lastly, why do feel the need to warn our children of the impending chaos?


[1] All summaries are taken directly from the Young Adult Library Services Association website.

 

Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

 
Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 664 other followers

%d bloggers like this: