Today, December 1, 2012, is the first day of Advent (the 24 day anticipation of Jesus’ coming or arrival). Advent simply means coming or arrival, and the nuance of the term coming is appropriate. Coming can refer to the historical event of Jesus’ first advent, the current remembrance of the incarnation or the future hope we have for Jesus’ second advent. Traditionally, the Advent wreath has five candles, representing Hope, Joy, Peace, Love and Christ. The first candle for this first week represents Hope. As such, Advent is marked from the outset as a season of hope, but what do we hope for? Read the rest of this entry »
Tag Archives: Christmas
Advent: Hope for What?
“Calvin and Hobbes” and the Joys of Snow Sculptures
Genius comes in many forms, including a six-year old boy’s awesome ability to craft truly deranged and nightmarish snow scenes! Oh, how we miss you and your beloved tiger, little man.
As for those of you who found yourself smiling from ear to ear, perhaps you can add this to your Christmas list. Just click the picture, and it’ll take you right to the definitive collection on amazon.com. Enjoy!
An Admittedly Offbeat List of My Top-10 Christmas Movies of All Time
When it comes to Christmas movies, everyone has a list of personal favorites. For your reading pleasure, I have decided to offer you a few of mine. Be warned. Some of the “classics” are not on this list because, truth be told, I loathe them. As for some of the other more … offbeat selections, what can I say? It’s my list. If you want to argue with me, feel free to do so in the comments below.
THE FINEST IN CHRISTMASTIME ENTERTAINMENT:
10. Mystery Science Theater 3000: Santa Clause Conquers the Martians (1989). If you’ve never heard of Mystery Science 3000, all I can say is this: get thee to Netflix! The conceit is simple. A man and two robots are trapped on a spaceship hurtling through the cosmos. To pass the time, they watch amazingly bad movies while offering up satiric commentary of the highest caliber. Truly, a work of art.
9. Die Hard (1988). While technically not really a “Christmas” movie, per se, the terrorists do strike while the office workers are enjoying a holiday party. And if you can’t find some measure of joy in John McClane gunnin’ down some European baddies, well … perhaps you just don’t see the slightly less-than-obvious connections between fighting terrorists and Christmas.
8. The Nativity Story (2006). If you watch this film, and I sincerely hope that you do, you’re probably going to be struck by two impressions. First, you’re going to really appreciate what they were able to communicate about the lives of Joseph and Mary in a Roman-occupied Israel. Secondly, you’re going to wish this movie was so much more than it really is.
7. Dr. Seuss’ How the Grinch Stole Christmas (1966). To be clear, we’re talking about the work of the one an only Theodore Geisel as interpreted by the animation of the incomparably awesome, Chuck Jones. If you don’t care for this masterpiece, all I can offer you is this simple warning:you may be in danger of having a heart that is “two sizes too small.”
6. A Midnight Clear (1992). Set in 1944 France, an American Intelligence Squad locates a German Platoon wishing to surrender rather than die in Germany’s final and futile offensive push. Isolated from the concerns of the politicians that control their fate, these two groups of men agree to put aside their differences for the sake of spending one Christmas together. The only question is, can the truce last?
5. The Nightmare Before Christmas (1993). This is the very best semi-deranged, stop-motion filmmaking you are likely to see this Christmas season. When Jack Skellington, the Pumpkin King of Halloweentown, discovers Christmastown, he enlists the aide of some rather unusual ghouls, ghosts and goblins to help him celebrate a new kind of Christmas, in a decidedly Halloween kind of way.
4. Gremlins (1984). There is something beautifully subversive about a Christmas movie that so gleefully embraces the notion that the things we so desperately want are often the things that come back to terrorize and haunt us. Materialists and consumerists beware. This surprisingly well-crafted satire is looking right at you and your wanton consumption.
3. Love Actually (2003). Some will find fault with me for including this film on the list. And there is no doubt that one particular storyline requires the viewer to look away rather frequently. But there is something that I absolutely love about this film and its quest to explore the roots of love. And to not include it would be dishonest as it truly is a favorite of mine. In fact, it may just be my favorite dramedy of all time.
2. Elf (2003). Buddy was a baby in an orphanage who stowed away in Santa’s sack and ended up at the North Pole. Later, as an adult human who happened to be raised by elves, Santa allows him to go to New York City to find his birth father, a man confined to the naughty-list. Of all this films on this list, this may be the most quotable. In fact, I dare you to “Say elf one more time!”
1. A Charlie Brown Christmas (1965). Repelled by the blatant commercialism that he sees all around him, Charlie Brown seeks in vein to find a single soul that understands the true meaning of Christmas. From sad-sack Christmas trees to Linus’ triumphant teaching in the end, this is unquestionably the single most note-perfect Christmas movie of all time.
SOME HONORABLE MENTIONS:
The Muppet Christmas Carol (1992). Oddly enough, not one single version of the classic Dickens’ tale was able to crack my Top-10. And in spite of it’s slightly manipulative tugging at the heart strings, I really do like the story. In fact, the Patrick Stewart production is probably my favorite version. But in the end, how can you give the nod to Stewart when this version has Kermit the Frog as Bob Cratchit?
A Christmas Story (1983). This film’s inability to crack my personal Top-10 truly surprised me. I have always said that this is a personal favorite around the holidays, but when it came time to craft the list, “double-dog daring” and tongues stuck to frozen lamp posts just couldn’t propel this film across the finish line. Still, a fun film worthy of an honorable mention.
Joyeux Noel (2006). On Christmas Eve during World War I, the Germans, French, and Scottish fraternize and get to know the men who live on the opposite side of a brutal war, in what became a true lesson of humanity. When it came down to putting a wartime flick in the Top-10, it was a toss-up between this and A Midnight Clear. And for whatever it’s worth, I’m not sure I made the right call.
ABOMINATIONS OF THE WORST ORDER (from the merely ghastly and grotesque to the apocalyptically awful!):
2. How the Grinch Stole Christmas (2000). I may never forgive either Ron Howard or Jim Carrey for the inane psychobabble and screechy noise that they needlessly injected into this most whimsical of Christmas tales. They had a wondrous short-story and an even more-inspired animated adaptation to build upon. And what did they do? They strip-mined it of any joy or ability to charm. Shame on both of you, gentlemen. Shame on both of you …
1. It’s a Wonderful Life (1946). Ah yes. Here at last, at the very end of our Christmas list, beneath such “classics” as Santa Slay and Silent Night, Deadly Night lays this sentimental mess of a film. If Dickens’ original tale already teetered on the edge of sappy, mawkishness, this film takes the source material and swan dives right over the edge of the cliff into the very depths of sanctimonious, saccharine goo.
Care to comment? Care to argue? The boards are now open …
Advent 2011: “Looking For Baby Jesus Under the Trash”
Last week, we began our journey through the advent season by taking a look at an early Christian hymn, penned over 2000 years ago. If you haven’t read the post, you can find it here at: Advent 2011: The Slave Who Refused to Rape. Now, as we make our way through the second week of Advent of the Christ, I want to introduce to you another song called “I Believe in Father Christmas.” While many of you may be familiar with the original version of this tune, written by Greg Lake and Peter Sinifield in the 1970s, I want to acquaint you with a more recent version that was only released two years ago. I want you to take a listen to this updated version by U2 in the player below, and as you do so, I’d like for you to follow along with the lyrics. See if you can figure out what the song is about.
They said there’d be snow at Christmas
They said there’d be peace on Earth
But instead it just keeps on raining
A veil of tears for the virgin’s birth
I remember on Christmas morning
A winters light and a distant choir
And the peal of a bell, that Christmas tree smell
and eyes full of tinsel and fireThey sold me a dream of Christmas
They sold me a Silent Night
And sold me a fairy story
But I believed in the Israelite
I believed in Father Christmas
I looked to the sky with excited eyes
‘Till I woke with a yawn in the first light of dawn
And I saw him and through his disguiseI wish you a hopeful Christmas
I wish you a brave New Year
May all anguish pain and sadness
Leave your heart, let your road be clear
They said there’dbe snow at Christmas
They said there’d be peace on Earth
Hallelujah, Noel be it Heaven or Hell
The Christmas we get we deserve.
If this is your first time hearing this tune, you might not realize how subversive the lead singer of U2 is being with the lyrics. Take a look again at the second verse. In the original version, the lyrics read as follows:
They sold me a dream of Christmas
They sold me a Silent Night
And they told me a fairy story
‘Til I believed in the Israelite
And I believed in Father Christmas
And I looked to the sky with excited eyes
‘Till I woke with a yawn in the first light of dawn
And I saw him and through his disguise
When Greg Lake and Peter Sinifield set out protest the commercialization of Christmas, they did so as two men who were grieving the loss of childhood innocence and belief. For them, the values of Christmas, which included forgiveness and acceptance, had been buried under a mountain of mythology that included everything from “Father Christmas” to “fairy stories” to “the Israelite,” Himself. But when it came time for U2 to cover this song, at the launch of the online subscription service, RedWire, Bono found that he could not sing these lyrics. For Bono, “the Israelite” is no myth. So instead of singing “Til I believed in the Israelite,” he subtly altered the lyric and sang: “But I believed in the Israelite.” Do you see the difference?
For Lake and Sinifield, the Christian story is just one more story in a series of lies that we tell our children. But for Bono, “the Israelite” is not in question. “The Israelite” is the very source of forgiveness, and it is His story that must stand out amidst all of the false claims that are made in a season of myths and half-truths.
Now go back to the 2:04 mark of the video above. Listen to how he elevates his voice into a falsetto, setting this segment of the song apart. In the original version by Lake, the vocalization is the same throughout the entirety of the piece. But Bono is trying something different here. The song is going to conclude with a choice between Heaven or Hell and the listener is going to “get what we deserve.” By rising into the falsetto immediately before this choice is to be made, Bono highlights a set of lyrics that call upon the rich imagery of Isaiah 40:3, a text used every year during the season of Advent.
“Listen! It’s the voice of someone shouting, “Clear the way through the wilderness for the LORD! Make a straight road through the wasteland for our God!”
Quite remarkable, isn’t it? Here, in a song that is sick with despair over the false stories that govern our lives, Bono asks the listener to cut through the wasteland and a make “clear road” for the way Lord.
And so, in this season of consumption, in this season of falsehoods and “fairy stories,” I say to you:
I wish you a hopeful Christmas.
I wish you a brave New Year.
May all anguish, pain, and sadness
Leave your heart, and let your road be clear.
Advent 2011: The Slave that Refused to Rape.
As we here in the West, and our brothers and sisters around the world, prepare to enter into the season of the Advent, we do so as a people who will be singing many hymns about the incarnation of the Christ. Today, for just a few moments, I’d like to take you back to one of the very first such hymns, a hymn that is actually found in Philippians 2:5-8:
“Have this mind among yourselves, which is yours in Jesus the Christ, who, though he was in the form of God, did not count equality with God a thing to be grasped, but made himself nothing, taking the form of a servant, being born in the likeness of men. And being found in human form, he humbled himself by becoming obedient to the point of death, even death on a cross.”
You see, while we sing songs about “silent nights” and “little drummer boys,” the early Christians were singing a very different tune, a tune that we here in the materialistic West would do very well to remember in this season of consumption.
Let’s start by taking a closer look at the phrase: “made himself nothing.” The Greek word here is kenoo,[1] and if translated literally, it means “emptied himself.” Now, in the past, many people have often suggested that we are to understand this to mean that Christ has “emptied himself” of his divine attributes, such as omnipotence, omnipresence, etc.… But when we take a look at how the Apostle Paul uses this verb elsewhere,[2] we come to realize that this is not about the emptying of certain qualities or traits. Rather, it is about the Christ’s shedding His dignity and glory as He takes on mortal flesh.
But the hymn doesn’t stop there; and neither does Paul. To say that the Christ sheds His dignity and glory is one thing, but to say that He takes on “the form of servant” is quite another thing altogether. You see, the word we translate as “servant” is actually the Greek word doulos,[3] which means “slave.” Now look back at the text:
“Have this mind among yourselves, which is yours in Christ Jesus, who, though he was in the form of God, did not count equality with God a thing to be grasped, but made himself nothing, taking the form of a doulos, being born in the likeness of men. And being found in human form, he humbled himself by becoming obedient to the point of death, even death on a cross.”
Do you see how the phrase “form of a doulos” echoes the earlier phrase in which Jesus is described as being in “the form of God?” The word “form” appears three times in this hymn and it means “nature” or “essence.” So just as the Christ was the very nature of God – the very essence of God! – so too has He now become the very nature, or essence, of a slave and a human being. In other words, this shedding of his dignity is not mere roll playing or play-acting. This isn’t a riff on a Greek myth in which a god disguises himself as a human being to travel amongst the people of the earth. This is Jesus, the Christ, the fully divine Son of God, electing to be fully human and fully enslaved. His divinity, His humanity and His enslavement are all now a part of His essential nature; and this is what is happening at the moment of the incarnation, at the moment of His birth.
Now, before I close out this first mediation of the Advent season, I want to take you back to the passage one last time.
“Have this mind among yourselves, which is yours in Christ Jesus, who, though he was in the form of God, did not count equality with God a thing to be grasped, but made himself nothing, taking the form of a doulos, being born in the likeness of men. And being found in human form, he humbled himself by becoming obedient to the point of death, even death on a cross.”
Do you see the phrase “to be grasped?” This phrase is based upon the Greek word harpagmos,[4] which is a very difficult word to translate. For not only is harpagmos a hapax legomenon within Scripture,[5] but it is also very rare in secular Greek as well. Nevertheless, from the limited sources we have, our best translations of the term center around the idea of forcible theft or rape. In other words, harpagmos is best understood as the violent act of taking that which you desire, regardless of the consequences to others.
Now look back to the text. Christ, who is divine in nature, “did not count equality with God” as a thing to be violently seized even though such equality was rightfully His. What the hymnist is trying to do here is to show you a contrast. Consider for a moment the magnitude of violence involved in the seizing and raping of another human being. In contrast to that, Christ set aside His own power and His equality with the Father and became incarnate as a slave unto mankind.
Are you beginning to grasp the nature of the descent. This isn’t merely about relocation, although leaving the confines of heaven for the created order certainly qualifies as “downward mobility.” And this isn’t merely about sacrificing personal relationships, although the Christ’s perfect union with the Father will be disrupted during His incarnation. This is about becoming something that You never were for the sake of those that live in open rebellion against You, your Father and the One who had yet to come. It’s about becoming degraded not by the forcible actions of others, but by a counter-intuitive move towards gracious condescension.
This season, as you begin to consider anew the work of the Savior in this world, I’m going to work to gently push you away from some of the standard images that surround this season. For this was not a “silent night.” It never was! And there is no room for sugary sentimentality as we consider the actions of a King who dared to become a slave.
[1] Kenoo is the English transliteration of the Greek word: kenouv.
[2] In all of Scripture, kenouv is used only four times, all by the Apostle Paul. Thus, by seeing how Paul uses it in other letters, we can gain a better understanding of how he intends to use it in this passage.
[3] Doulos is the English transliteration of the Greek word: doulos.
[4] Harpagmos is the English transliteration of the Greek word: ‘arpagmos.
[5] An hapax legomenon is defined as a word that only appears one time within a given text. Because of its unique status, it is near impossible to translate inter-textually; and requires that one use outside resources to interpret the meaning of the author.


